The Spirit of the Lord GOD is upon Me...
To comfort all who mourn, To console those who mourn in Zion,
To give them beauty for ashes, The oil of joy for mourning,
The garment of praise for the spirit of heaviness;
That they may be called trees of righteousness,
The planting of the LORD, that He may be glorified."

Isaiah 61:1,2c,3 (New King James Version)

Friday, December 14, 2012

Newtown, Conneticut.

I can't begin to explain the sadness in my heart.
I can't begin narrate the chaos of emotion inside my head.
What I can do is make my voice be heard right now. Something has GOT to give. Something NEEDS to change. We shouldn't live in a world that Kindergartners are not safe in their own classroom. That a 24 year old can hold so much anger, have access to high power weapons and take away the light of these littles in a small town elementary school. But we do. We live with the real questions on what the right decision is in dealing with the problem.
More guns?
Less guns?
Gun reform?
Gun control?
Bullet proof bubbles for all those who don't "deserve" to die?
I'm not completely sure what is "right" in this battle. I'm just not. I'm sitting here reeling through flashbacks in my head of the day Makenna died. Projecting that into fantasy scenarios of what the massacre would of looked like in my own Kindergartners room today. Wondering what it would of felt like to be the dispatcher taking that call or the firefighters moving bodies to see who might have a chance. I wonder what the teacher in that classroom felt like, hopeless. You see, I've filled all these rolls, I've signed the death certificate of my daughter due to gun violence, I've taken frantic 911 calls due to gun violence, responded to horrific crime scenes due to gun violence, and I've taught in many many classrooms in which I loved those kids so deeply that I would go to the greatest depth to protect them. This tragedy hit home. I'm thankful and praise God that this tragedy has not CAME to my home...not yet at least.
There is a lot wrong with guns. The number one thing is the people who are allowed to buy them. How many times do we hear about a mass murderer who obtained his weapons legally usually within a short time of the massacre? How many of these people had reached out to get help before hand? Performed erratic behavior before? Hmmm in my recent memory, it's been every single one. Virginia Tech, Aurora, and the recent Portland shootings. Why can't there be even a basic social background check. A look into medical release? A simple psychological evaluation? Too much time? Too much paperwork? Violating a civil right to bare arms? My ex-husband who killed my youngest daughter bought a .45mm handgun one week before her death. She was killed with that weapon. He was under the care of a psychiatrist for PTSD with the military and had multiple combat deployments. He had all of a 30 minute wait period before he walked out of Bass Pro Shop with the weapon. Less than a week later, I had two hours of HELL waiting to hear the doctor tell me my daughter was dead, followed by months of paperwork, and my own temporary psychological deterioration. So where exactly, on what side, is there too much paperwork. On which side of this scenario are people's civil rights being taken away? Call me selfish, but I would much prefer a proactive government than a retroactive government and have less death certificates and more background checks. Get a better picture of the guy trying to buy a Semi Automatic Assault Rifle with 500 rounds of ammunition along with some body armour before you sell it to him. Then maybe we won't see 26 pictures of innocent school members on the news, teddy bears by white crosses, and parents running in fear hoping they'll be reunited with their children. Perhaps, if we get those who want to protect themselves to talk to a mental health professional we can stop just one of these tragedies. Just stopping one is enough for me, at one point just stopping one bullet would of been enough for me.
This needs to change. It needed to change yesterday, last year, 3 years ago. Pro Gun and Anti-gun need to find a ground that those who can't protect themselves are protected. The government and the people need to work together logically and figure this out. Our society today isn't the same it was when everyone had a gun on their shoulder, times have changed. Just as our constitution that we all fight so adamantly to defend was written to evolve we all need to wake up and evolve and see what is wrong for what it is, and what is right for what it could be. I haven't lost faith in humanity, far from it. But my heart is broken, from where our society fails. Where I have failed. It is going to stop now. My voice will be heard.
I need a bigger platform to get this out. I have contacted Ellen DeGeneres, please share my story with her as well! Anyone that I can get a bigger voice out. I need your help!

6 comments:

  1. Jessica- My heart goes out to you at this time. And while I appreciate your passion for what you believe, I do not believe it is appropriate at this time to take a stance on your political opinion about guns on my FB page. I have removed your comment. I think you saying it here, on your personal blog, is the perfect way to share your heart with the world. I hope you can understand. Be blessed-
    Amanda from iambaker.net

    ReplyDelete
  2. None of us could ever imagine or fathom the loss of a child,or the hell you have been through. At the time your baby passed on it was sureal,how could that happen to a precious baby,who I had the chance to meet,and be graced with her smile. I commend you on this plight to bring awareness to gun related deaths. No parent should have to endure such a loss. You have been given the gift of courage,and to be the voice to those other victims of gun violence.May God bless you.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I disagree with Amanda.... Now IS the time! I agree with you, Jessica, something needs to change!

    ReplyDelete
  4. first of all, i'm sorry for your tragic loss.... no parent should ever have to bury their child.
    i'm going to sound like an asshole here, and that's fine by me.
    you live in california? california has some of the TOUGHEST gun laws of any state... please tell me how making them tougher would've helped anything?
    you say:

    "My ex-husband who killed my youngest daughter bought a .45mm handgun one week before her death. She was killed with that weapon. He was under the care of a psychiatrist for PTSD with the military and had multiple combat deployments. He had all of a 30 minute wait period before he walked out of Bass Pro Shop with the weapon. Less than a week later, I had two hours of HELL waiting to hear the doctor tell me my daughter was dead, followed by months of paperwork, and my own temporary psychological deterioration. So where exactly, on what side, is there too much paperwork. On which side of this scenario are people's civil rights being taken away? Call me selfish, but I would much prefer a proactive government than a retroactive government"

    i'm sure you've asked yourself the question many times over the years, at least i HOPE you have....
    how pro-active were YOU?
    YOU knew your husband's background (i am also a vet with combat deployments by the way) you knew his problems, what did YOU do as a social background check to stop him purchasing a handgun?

    you think the government should step in and make decisions on a person's civil liberties when you didn't step in yourself?

    if he was as mentally gone as you describe, is it possible he would've hurt you or your child even without a gun?

    the answer is NOT more laws that don't work, banning inanimate objects with no will of their own, 300 million guns didn't kill anyone last week, 3 or 4 in the hands of the wrong people did, and that's a tragedy...

    FYI, the CT shooter didn't legally own any of those guns, and since he was under 21, he couldn't have owned a handgun, that's why he killed his mother and took hers....

    maybe she should've had them locked in a safe he didn't have access to...

    my bet is he would've found a way to kill her and those kids anyway...

    who would you have decide who is and isn't able to own firearms? some government agency? the police? a psychologist (most of whom are anti-gun anyway)

    every democrat in this country is SALIVATING to push for a ban on certain guns just because of the way they look.... it's black and scary looking, it must be evil!

    those 6 year olds aren't even in the ground and politicians are already exploiting their deaths.... THAT should piss you off....

    what pisses me off? is that you're trying to decide what *I* can and cannot own...

    this kid broke every gun law we have on the books, murder is also illegal.... that didn't seem to stop him either, tell me how MORE laws will prevent this in the future.... please...

    ReplyDelete
  5. P.S.

    Virginia Tech, Aurora, the mall in portland and the school in CT have one more thing in common.....

    they are ALL "Gun Free Zones"

    places where a crazed gunman looking to do maximum damage KNOWS they will not face armed opposition....

    we may as well rename "gun free zones" and call them what they really are, "free target zones"

    a cop or security guard on duty at ANY of those places may or may not have been able to help.... but by NOT being there, they CERTAINLY didn't help anything.

    http://www.kgw.com/news/Clackamas-man-armed-confronts-mall-shooter-183593571.html

    ReplyDelete
  6. Actually, we lived in Virginia at the time..which you know does not have strict gun laws.

    Virginia Tech Aurora and the Mall in Portland also had another thing in common. The weapons and body armor were all purchased legally, by a sociopath, within a short time of the incident. The shooter also tried to buy a gun legally, before the CT incident.
    As far as my husband.
    1. No, he would not of hurt us without the gun. In fact he was practicing dry firing because of his extreme paranoia about our house being attacked by terrorist. He felt the need to have a fast draw. I was proactive, I thought. I had NEVER witnessed him doing this.
    2. My husband assured me he never did the things, he did do.
    like keep a round in the chamber of his Glock 45mm which would of prevented the kids from getting it and firing since they were young and could no rack a round.
    He was a firearms safety instructor and we constantly talked about gun safety I only knew about his PTSD diagnosis because I found documents following her death. He shared a his pain and suffering with his Doctor, than not his wife whom he thought he had to protect.
    I fought adamantly about the purchase of this gun, about him carrying the way he did, and what went to an unhealthy obsession with home safety. To say I wasn't proactive is unfair. To say I couldn't tell what the future held is beyond accurate. To say that my thoughts have evolved when I was put into my new life is also entirely accurate. As a US citizen who believes in the right to own firearms, I am also not delusional in thinking we need laws, better laws to regulated them.
    Laws do work, they have been proven too. Lower speed limits reduce accidents, shoplifting signs discourage petty thieves, and DUI laws promote calling a taxi. Are they perfect? No they aren't human nature is selfish and can't see beyond it's own needs at times, but they help. Had the CT shooter's Mom had better knowledge of gun safety or not been sold an assault rifle to begin with. Maybe it wouldn't of happened, or maybe more victims could of escaped the slow fire of a handgun over the rapid fire of an high capacity assault rifle.

    ReplyDelete